Innovative platforms of Russia – "good and various" (structural analysis) Part 2

  • Natalia V. Latova Institute of Sociology, Russian Academy of Sciences myshona@rambler.ru
  • Yuryi V. Latov Institute of Sociology, Russian Academy of Sciences latov@mail.ru
Acknowledgments
This article was prepared with the support of the RGNF. Project №13-03-00015а Continuous education and transfer knowledge based technologiesmodels of interaction between institutions of education and science and enterprises of real and financial sectors
How to Cite
Latova N.V., Latov Y.V. 2016. Innovative platforms of Russia – "good and various" (structural analysis) Part 2 — Sociologicheskaja nauka i social’naja praktika. Vol. 4. No. 2. P. 5-20. DOI: https://doi.org/10.19181/snsp.2016.4.2.4268 (in Russ.).

Abstract

This article completes the analysis started by the authors in the previous issue on the development of Russian innovation platforms (primarily industrial parks), which are expected to become “points of growth”, able to provide a decisive impetus to the entire national economy, similar to the famous Silicon Valley in the US. Considering the role ofthe four main actors ofRussian innovation (business, public administration, science and higher education institutions), the authors conclude that this “quartet” still remains uncoordinated: each actor has its own interests, which are not always and “not quite” linked to stimulating technological innovation.The “Science, technology and education” section adopted in the December 2015 Russian Federation National Security Strategy is a clear expression of the contradictions of Russian technology policy. On the one hand, it rightly emphasizes the need to develop a “national innovation system”; on the other, is approach that is not quite correct is set out regarding the factors adversely affecting the national security process.
Keywords:
sociology of innovation, technological innovation, innovative sites, parks, national economic security, national security, technological

Author Biographies

Natalia V. Latova, Institute of Sociology, Russian Academy of Sciences
Сandidate of Sociological Sciences, Senior Researcher
Yuryi V. Latov, Institute of Sociology, Russian Academy of Sciences
Doctor of Sociological Sciences, Candidate of Economic Sciences, Leading Researcher

References

Buzgalin A. V., Kolganov A. I. Reindustrializacija i/ili prioritetnoe razvitie kreatos- fery (k voprosu o celjah social’no-jekonomicheskoj strategii)/ [Reindustrialization and/ or the priority development of createsphere (to the question about the goals of socio-eco¬nomic strategy)]. [Elektronnyj resurs]. Al’ternativy. URL: http://www.altemativy.m/ru/ node/10219 (data obrashhenija: 10.05.2016). (In Russ.).



Gohberg L. M. Statistika nauki. [Statistics of science]. — M.: TEIS, 2003. — 478 s. (In Russ.).



Grjehjem L. Smozhet li Rossija konkurirovat’? Istorija innovacij v carskoj, sovetskoj i sovremennoj Rossii: per. s angl. [ Will Russia be able to compete? The history of innovation in tsarist, Soviet and modern Russia]. — M.: Mann, Ivanov i Ferber, 2014. — 256 s. (In Russ.).



Zapis’ «zolotoj lekcii Ponomareva o «Skolkovo». 19.04.2013. [Record “the Golden lecture"on Ponomarev’s SKOLKOVO]. [Elektronnyj resurs]. Life News URL: https://life. ru/t/%D0%BD%D0%BE%D0%B2%D0%BE%D1%81%D1%82%D0%B8/112973 (data obrashhenija: 27.04.2016). (In Russ.).



Latov Ju. V. Simuljakry znanij i obrazovatel’nye neravenstva v sfere andragogichesk- ogo obrazovanija. [The simulacra of knowledge and educational inequality in the sphere of providingandragogicaleducation]. J. Monitoring obshhestvennogo mnenija: jekonomich- eskie i social’nye peremeny. — 2014. — № 2 (120). — S. 211 —219. (In Russ.).



Molchanov N. N., Molchanov A. N. Tehnoparki — koncepcija «chetvjortoj spira- li». [Technology parks — the concept of a “fourth helix"]. J. Innovacii. — 2014. — № 7. — S. 39—46. (In Russ.).



Plitman A. Tehnoparki: v ozhidanii innovacionnogo proryva. [Technology parks: innovation in anticipation of a breakthrough]. [Elektronnyj resurs]. CRN/RE («IT-biznes»). Reguljarnyj vypusk № 14 (409). 9 oktjabrja 2013 g. URL: http://www.crn.ru/numbers/ reg-numbers/detail.php?ID=84105 (data obrashhenija: na 10.05.2016). (In Russ.).



Problemy i reshenija: biznes-inkubatory i tehnoparki Rossii. 2014. [Problems and solutions: business incubators and technoparks in Russia]. [Elektronnyj resurs]. OAO «RVK» URL: https://www.rusventure.ru/ru/programm/analytics/docs/201403 Business incu- bators.pdf (data obrashhenija:10.05.2016). (In Russ.).



Ukaz Prezidenta RF ot 12 maja 2009 g. № 537 «O Strategii nacional’noj bezo- pasnosti Rossijskoj Federacii do 2020 goda». [The decree of the President of the Russian Federation of 12 may 2009 № 537 “About strategy of national security of the Russian Federation until2020"]. [Elektronnyj resurs]. Konsul’tantPljus URL: http://www.consul- tant.ru/document/cons_doc_LAW_87685/ (data obrashhenija: 16.05.2016). (In Russ.).



Ukaz Prezidenta RF ot 31 dekabrja 2015 g. № 683 «O Strategii nacional’noj bezo- pasnosti Rossijskoj Federacii». [The decree of the President of the Russian Federation from December 31, 2015 № 683 “About strategy of national security of the Russian Federation”]. [Elektronnyj resurs]. Garant. Informacionno-pravovoe obespechenie URL: http://base. garant.ru/71296054/ (data obrashhenija: 16.05.2016). (In Russ.).



Hajek fon F. Konkurencija kak procedura otkrytija. J. Mezhdunarodnaja jekonomi- ka i mezhdunarodnye otnoshenija. — 1989. — № 12. — S. 6—14. (In Russ.).



Shul’gin V. V. Dni. 1920. Zapiski. — M.: Sovremennik, 1989. — 560 s. (In Russ.).
Citation Formats
Other cite formats:

Harvard
Latova, N. V. and Latov, Y. V. (2016) ’Innovative platforms of Russia – "good and various" (structural analysis) Part 2’, Sociologicheskaja nauka i social’naja praktika, 4(2), pp. 5-20. doi: https://doi.org/10.19181/snsp.2016.4.2.4268.