Attitude to Immigrants in the Mass Consciousness of Europeans (using the example of secondary analysis of ESS 2016 data). Part 2
Research Article
How to Cite
Zhavoronkov A.V., Voronina N.S. 2021. Attitude to Immigrants in the Mass Consciousness of Europeans (using the example of secondary analysis of ESS 2016 data). Part 2 — Sociologicheskaja nauka i social’naja praktika. Vol. 9. No. 3. P. 216-237. DOI: https://doi.org/10.19181/snsp.2021.9.3.8443 (in Russ.).
Abstract
In the second part of the article, the problem of positioning in the space of society ten clusters obtained in the study of European countries in 2016 is solved. The internal structure of clusters is considered by combining the patterns of deviations in the vectors of estimates of immigration, depending on the social characteristics of the carriers of these estimates. For this purpose, the method of formalizing the series of frequency deviations by the Student’s criterion, dispersion, correlation, regression, entropy analyzes, the method of constructing decision trees, tested in previous works of the authors, have been applied. A feature of this approach is going beyond the boundaries of a narrow consideration of paired relationships of features. The direction and force of deviation from some points of the centers of a stable state of activity of mass behaviour and assessments of mass consciousness in the studied area is considered in a broad context of indicators. This makes it possible to construct two-dimensional landscape maps of the vectors of activity deviation and assessments in different clusters of countries presented in the first part of the article and makes it possible to arrive at ideas about the action of common factors of social semantics that determine both the unity and the variety of phenomena found in the ESS-2016 study.
Keywords:
European Social Research, attitudes towards immigrants, differentiation, regression analysis, entropy analysis, analysis of variance, CHAID decision tree method
References
1. Gruzdev A. V. (2016). Prognoznoe modelirovanie v IBM SPSS Statistic i R: Metod derev’ev reshenij. [Predictive Modeling in IBM SPSS Statistics and R: Decision Trees Method]. M. : DMK Press publ. 276 p. (In Russ.).
2. Zрavoronkov A. V. (2007). Rossijskoe obshchestvo: potreblenie, kommunikaciya i prinyatie reshenij, 1967–2004. [Russian Society: Consumption, Communication and Decision Making, 1967–2004]. M. : «Vershina» publ. 569 p. (In Russ.).
3. Mastikova N. S. (2019). Otnoshenie k migrantam i privnosimym imi izmeneniyam: otsenki rossiyan i evropejtsev. [Attitudes towards migrants and the changes they bring: assessments of Russians and Europeans]. Vestnik Instituta sotsiologii. Vol. 10, № 4. P. 55–71. DOI: 10.19181/vis.2019.31.4.604 (In Russ.).
4. Mukomel’ V. I. (2017). Ksenofoby i ih antipody, kto oni? [Xenophobes and their antipodes, who are they?]. Mir Rossii. Vol. 1, P. 32–57. (In Russ.).
5. Sotsial’noe neravenstvo etnicheskih grupp: predstavleniya i real’nost’. (2002). [Social inequality of ethnic groups: perceptions and reality]. Ed. by L. M. Drobizheva. M. : Academia publ. 480 p. (In Russ.).
6. Berg J. A. (2010). Race, Class, Gender, and Social Space: Using an Intersectional Approach to Study Immigration Attitudes. Sociological Quarterly. Vol. 51, № 2. P. 278–302. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1533-8525.2010.01172.x
7. Bessudnov A. (2015). Ethic Hierarchy and Public Attitudes Towards Immigrants in Russia. European Sociological Review. Vol. 32, № 5. P. 567–580. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/esr/jcw002
8. Hainmueller J., Hopkins D. J. (2014). Public Attitudes Toward Immigration. Annual Review of Political Science. Vol. 17, P. 225–249.
9. Herreros F., Criado H. (2009). Social Trust, Social Capital and Perceptions of Immigration. Political Studies. Vol. 57, № 2. P. 337–355. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9248.2008.00738.x
2. Zрavoronkov A. V. (2007). Rossijskoe obshchestvo: potreblenie, kommunikaciya i prinyatie reshenij, 1967–2004. [Russian Society: Consumption, Communication and Decision Making, 1967–2004]. M. : «Vershina» publ. 569 p. (In Russ.).
3. Mastikova N. S. (2019). Otnoshenie k migrantam i privnosimym imi izmeneniyam: otsenki rossiyan i evropejtsev. [Attitudes towards migrants and the changes they bring: assessments of Russians and Europeans]. Vestnik Instituta sotsiologii. Vol. 10, № 4. P. 55–71. DOI: 10.19181/vis.2019.31.4.604 (In Russ.).
4. Mukomel’ V. I. (2017). Ksenofoby i ih antipody, kto oni? [Xenophobes and their antipodes, who are they?]. Mir Rossii. Vol. 1, P. 32–57. (In Russ.).
5. Sotsial’noe neravenstvo etnicheskih grupp: predstavleniya i real’nost’. (2002). [Social inequality of ethnic groups: perceptions and reality]. Ed. by L. M. Drobizheva. M. : Academia publ. 480 p. (In Russ.).
6. Berg J. A. (2010). Race, Class, Gender, and Social Space: Using an Intersectional Approach to Study Immigration Attitudes. Sociological Quarterly. Vol. 51, № 2. P. 278–302. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1533-8525.2010.01172.x
7. Bessudnov A. (2015). Ethic Hierarchy and Public Attitudes Towards Immigrants in Russia. European Sociological Review. Vol. 32, № 5. P. 567–580. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/esr/jcw002
8. Hainmueller J., Hopkins D. J. (2014). Public Attitudes Toward Immigration. Annual Review of Political Science. Vol. 17, P. 225–249.
9. Herreros F., Criado H. (2009). Social Trust, Social Capital and Perceptions of Immigration. Political Studies. Vol. 57, № 2. P. 337–355. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9248.2008.00738.x
Article
Received: 15.03.2021
Accepted: 28.09.2021
Citation Formats
Other cite formats:
Harvard
Zhavoronkov, A. V. and Voronina, N. S. (2021) ’Attitude to Immigrants in the Mass Consciousness of Europeans (using the example of secondary analysis of ESS 2016 data). Part 2’, Sociologicheskaja nauka i social’naja praktika, 9(3), pp. 216-237. doi: https://doi.org/10.19181/snsp.2021.9.3.8443.
Section
ETHNOSOCIOLOGY
