Urban family with minor children: resources, moral guidelines and social adaptation of working parents. Part one

Research Article
How to Cite
Bessokirnaya G.P., Bolshakova O.A., Karakhanova T.M. 2024. Urban family with minor children: resources, moral guidelines and social adaptation of working parents. Part one — Sociologicheskaja nauka i social’naja praktika. Vol. 12. No. 3. P. 173-197. DOI: https://doi.org/10.19181/snsp.2024.12.3.8 (in Russ.).

Abstract

The first part of the article presents the results of studying the daily activities of working parents in the field of caring for minor children and their upbringing. Data from monitoring studies of the daily activities and time budget of urban residents carried out during 1986-2020 were used. The composition of families with children is considered and the resource characteristics of parents are analyzed, which turned out to be very similar for fathers and mothers. The relationship of parents' time spent on caring for children and their upbringing with parents' belonging to fathers and mothers, with their age, level of education, religious identity and income level in parents' families, as well as with some value orientations of fathers and mothers, is investigated. The analysis showed that the objective picture of working parents using time resources for activities with children does not agree with their subjective opinion that “activities with their childre n, their upbringing is the most important thing in the life of both spouses”. At the same time, most working fathers and mothers are satisfied with the time spent both on caring for children and on their upbringing as time resources. The characteristics of the provision of fathers and mothers with other resources do not affect their satisfaction with time spent. There is a direct relationship between satisfaction with the time spent on raising children and parents' satisfaction with life in general. An analysis of the moral guidelines of parents, which are the moral basis for the process of socialization of minor children in the family, has shown that more than half of the moral qualities related to virtues are the norm for the vast majority of fathers and to a somewhat lesser extent for mothers. At the same time, there is a tendency to blur parents' ideas about qualities-virtues and anti-virtues as a norm and deviation from it. In addition, a trend is emerging in which, judging by estimates, a considerable part of parents do not see a positive life prospect for their children, in terms of their social adaptation, if children in life are guided by the same virtues as the parents themselves. The first part in the article analyzes the composition and resource potential and the use of time resources of parents for child care and upbringing. The second part will be about the moral guidelines and the results of social adaptation of working parents. The numbering of tables and figures is continuous in both parts.
Keywords:
family with minor children, resource potential of fathers and mothers, moral guidelines, time spent on child care, time spent on raising children, life satisfaction in general

Author Biographies

Galina P. Bessokirnaya, Institute of Sociology of FCTAS RAS, Moscow, Russia
Candidate of Economics Senior Researcher
Olga A. Bolshakova, Institute of Sociology of FCTAS RAS, Moscow, Russia
Candidate of Sociology Senior Researcher
Tatiana M. Karakhanova, Institute of Sociology of FCTAS RAS, Moscow, Russia
Candidate of Economics, Leading Researcher

References

1. Avdeeva V. P., Burmykina O. N. [et al.] The Russian family and the welfare of children. I. I. Eliseeva ed. Saint-Petersburg: FNISCZ RAN; 2021. 304 p. (In Russ.). ISBN 978-5-89697-360-7. DOI 10.19181/monogr.978-5-89697-360-7.2021.

2. Nureyev R. M., Kapoguzov E. A., Latov Yu. V. [et al.] Family households and family policy in modern Russia: [monograph]. R. M. Nureyev, E. A. Kapoguzov ed. Moscow: KnoRus; 2023. 235 p. (In Russ.). ISBN 978-5-406-11752-1.

3. Ryazantsev S. V., Rostovskaya T. K. [et al.] Demographic well-being of Russia. National demographic report. S. V. Ryazantsev ed. FNISC RAS. Moscow: ITD «Perspektiva»; 2022. 108 p. (In Russ.). ISBN 978-5-88045-557-7. DOI 10.19181/monogr.978-5-88045-557-7.2022.

4. Sinelnikov A. B. Family values as the goal of life for legal spouses and cohabitants. Population=Narodonaselenie. 2018;21(2):46-59. (In Russ.). DOI 10.26653/1561-7785-2018-21-2-04.

5. Antonov A. I., Karpova V. M., Lyalikova S. V. [et al.] The family-child lifestyle values (SeDOJ-2019): an analytical report on the results of an interregional sociological and demographic study: Moscow, MSU, Faculty of Sociology. A. I. Antonov, ed. Moscow: MAKS Press; 2020. 486 p. (In Russ.). 3,1 Mb. ISBN 978-5317-06320-7. DOI 10.29003/m857.SeDOJ-2019.

6. Antonov A. I. ed. Similarity and difference of value orientations of husbands and wives according to the results of a simultaneous survey of spouses . Moscow: Pero; 2021. 240 p. (In Russ.). ISBN 978-5-00171-794-2.

7. Rostovskaya T. K., Egorychev A. M. The Russian traditional family: socio-philosophical analysis and comprehension prospects for preservation and development. Alma Mater (Bulletin of the higher school)=Alma Mater (Vestnik Vysshey Shkoly). 2023;(1):97-106. (In Russ.). DOI 10.20339/AM.01-23.097.

8. Gurko T. A. The Lifestyles of Russian Parents: Trends and Regional, Age, and Professional Specifics . Sociological science and social practice=Sociologicheskaya nauka i social'nayapraktika. 2018;6(2):94-109. (In Russ.). DOI 10.19181/snsp.2018.6.2.5859.

9. Bezrukova O. N., Samoilova V. A. “Unnecessary” children? The values of parenthood, the rights of fathers and mothers in the sociocultural attitudes of Russians. Sociological Studies=Sotsiologicheskie Issledovaniia. 2023;(8):101-111. (In Russ.). DOI 10.31857/S013216250027371-1.

10. Dorofeeva Z. E., Kozyreva P. M. Transformation of practices of parental involvement in children's lives. Sociological Studies= Sotsiologicheskie Issledovaniia. 2023;(8):86-100. (In Russ.). DOI 10.31857/S013216250027370-0.

11. Gurko T. A. Development of the parenthood institution: analysis of empirical indicators. Woman in Russian society=Zhenshchina v rossi skom obshchestve. 2022;(4):3-14. (In Russ.). DOI 10.21064/WinRS.2022.4.1.

12. Levenskikh I. A. The role positions of the father in the modern family. Herald of Omsk University=Vestnik. Omskogo universiteta. 2012;(1):349-353. (In Russ.).

13. Avdeeva A. V. “Plugged fatherhood” in modern Russia: the strategies of caring for children. Sociological Studies=Sotsiologicheskie Issledovaniia. 2012;(11):95-104. (In Russ.).

14. Yablonskaya N. V. Psychological analysis of the inflation of the “father's image” in modern society. In: Actual problems of modern science. IV International Scientific and Practical Conference: in three volumes. Alushta: Stavropol'skij un-t. 2015; Vol. 1 Ser. Issue 4. P. 354-357. (In Russ.).

15. Sheremetyeva N. A. Education of boys as future heads of families. In: Social services for families and children: a scientific and methodological collection. Issue 10. Modern family: from theory to practice. The experience of social service institutions. Saint-Petersburg: GBU Gorodskoj informacionno-metodicheskij centr «Sem'ya»; 2017. P. 143-152. (In Russ.).

16. Churilova E. V. Structure and wellbeing of incomplete families in Russia. Sociological Studies=Sotsiologicheskie Issledovaniia. 2015;(3):78-81. (In Russ.).

17. Zaharov S. V., Churilova E. V. The phenomenon of single motherhood in Russia: statistical and demographic analysis of the prevalence and mechanisms of its formation. Universe of Russia=Mir Rossii. 2013;22(4):86-113. (In Russ.).

18. Rostovskaya T. K., Khasbulatova O. A., Smirnova I. N. Single mothers in Russian society: strokes to a social portrait. Woman in Russian society=Zhenshchina v rossiiskom obshchestve. 2023;(1):32-42. (In Russ.).

19. Rostovskaya T. K., Vasilyeva E. N. Social portrait of single fathers: an analysis within the framework of the concept of responsible parenthood. Social space=Social'noeprostranstvo. 2023;9(1):1-15. (In Russ.). DOI 10.15838/sa.2023.1.37.2.

20. Dorofeeva Z. E. Characteristics of large families' practices. Sociological Studies=Sotsiologicheskie Issledovaniia. 2019;(7):114-124. (In Russ.). DOI 10.31857/S013216250005798-0.

21. Sinelnikov A. B. The family-demographic context of having many children in modern Russia. In: Proceedings of the XIII International sociological Grushin Conference. “Rebuilding the world: research (in) a new reality” (May 25-27, 2023). Moscow: VTsIOM; 2023. P. 77-82. (In Russ.). ISBN 978-5-906345-46-2.

22. Smelov P. A., Nikitina S. Yu., eds. The Demographic Yearbook of Russia. 2021: Statistical Handbook. Moscow: Stat. sb. Rosstat; 2021. 256 p. (In Russ.).

23. Pozdnyakova M. E., Bruno V. V. Aggressive behavior of children and adolescents as a predictor of deviant and criminal behavior: environmental and personal factors. Russia reforming=Rossiya reformiruyushhayasya. 2023;(12):407-447. (In Russ.). DOI 10.19181/ezheg.2023.16.

24. Karakhanova T. M. Household activity of the urban population: its dynamics for the period from 1986 to 1995. In: V. D. Patrushev ed. Daily life and labor behavior of the working population. Moscow: Izd-vo Instituta sociologii RAN; 1998. P. 77-94. (In Russ.).

25. Karakhanova T. M. ed. Daily activities of urban residents during the years of reforms: time budget, values, trends (1986-2008). Moscow: Izd-vo Instituta sociologii RAN; 2010. 343 p. (In Russ.). ISBN 978-5-89697-185-6.

26. Karakhanova T. M., Bolshakova O. A. Daily activities of urban residents: adaptive structuring of time resources and equity in opportunities. Russia reforming=Rossiya reformiruyushhayasya. 2022;(20):502-525. (In Russ.). DOI 10.19181/ezheg.2022.20.

27. Karakhanova T. M., Bolshakova O. A. Household activities in the household: necessary and demanded unpaid labor of urban workers. Bulletin of the Institute of Sociology=Vestnik instituta sotziologii. 2018;9(2):100-129. (In Russ.). DOI 10.19181/vis.2018.25.2.512.

28. Karakhanova T. M. Time spent on classes with children as indicators of their social significance. In: T. M. Karakhanova ed. Lifestyle of citizens in objective and subjective indicators. Moscow: Izd-vo Instituta sociologii RAN; 2002. P. 11-19. (In Russ.).

29. Karakhanova T. M. Value orientations of working women and the use of time. Sociological Studies=Sotsiologicheskie Issledovaniia. 2003;(3):74-81. (In Russ.).

30. Karakhanova T. M. Dynamics of subjective and objective indicators of the importance of classes with children for urban residents. In: Sociology and society: global challenges and regional development. Materials of the IV Regular All-Russian Sociological Congress. Moscow: ROS; 2012. P. 3380-3389. ISBN 978-5-904804-06-0.

31. The results of the VPN 2020 (All-Russian Population Census 2020). Volume 8. Number and composition of households. 2022. Federal State Statistics Service of the Russian Federation: [website]. Available at: https://rosstat.gov.ru/vpn/2020/Tom8_Chislo_i_sostav_domohozyajstv (accessed: 25.06.2024).
Article

Received: 07.07.2024

Accepted: 27.09.2024

Citation Formats
Other cite formats:

Harvard
Bessokirnaya, G. P., Bolshakova, O. A. and Karakhanova, T. M. (2024) ’Urban family with minor children: resources, moral guidelines and social adaptation of working parents. Part one’, Sociologicheskaja nauka i social’naja praktika, 12(3), pp. 173-197. doi: https://doi.org/10.19181/snsp.2024.12.3.8.