«Megalopolis» and «Remote Place» as Models of Value Orientations and Political Attitudes of Russians

  • Irina N. Trofimova Institute of Sociology of Russian Academy of sciences itnmv@mail.ru
How to Cite
Trofimova I.N. 2015. «Megalopolis» and «Remote Place» as Models of Value Orientations and Political Attitudes of Russians — Sociologicheskaja nauka i social’naja praktika. No. 3. P. 60-78.

Abstract

This paper studies the settlement-type factor that affects the formation of value orientations and related political attitudes of Russians. There is a deep intersettlement differentiation in modern Russia. The typology of settlements takes into account not only the structural elements but also their level of development. The agglomeration of Moscow and Saint Petersburg are at the top of the hierarchical system of settlements. The dissemination of innovations in the social space of Russia derives from the largest and most developed to the less developed types of communities. Different types of settlements determine the specificity of value orientations, which the current article discusses as models of “megalopolis” and “remote place”. These models detect unifying and dividing values that are located in the complex and contradictory interaction and dynamics. The majority of Russians are united in their quest for social justice and stability. At the same time, the residents of the metropolis have a more pronounced focus on the individual, rational, and activist values, whereas the residents of the provinces have collectivist, regulatory, and paternalistic values. In addition, the value structure of the residents of the metropolis is characterised by its diversity, simultaneous presence of the values and attitudes of the liberal, conservative and social-democratic orientation, the possibility of choice and, consequently, greater individual freedom Megacities concentrate resources to develop new guidelines to form the value of the future, whereas the province provides stability and continuity A balance between these two opposites can ensure dynamism and the continuity of social development.
Keywords:
settlement factor, settlement types, values orientation, political attitudes, models

Author Biography

Irina N. Trofimova, Institute of Sociology of Russian Academy of sciences
Doctor of Political Sciences, Leading staff scientist

References

Burd’e P. Sotsiologiya politiki. [Sociology of Politics]. / Sost., obshch. red. i predisl. N. A. Shmatko. M.: Socio-Logos, 1993. — 336 s. (Russ. ed.).



Zubarevich N. Modernizatsiya i rossiiskoe prostranstvo. Doklad o razvitii chelovecheskogo potentsiala v Rossiiskoi Federatsii za 2011 g. [Modernization and the Russian space. Report on Human Development in the Russian Federation in 2011]. Pod red. A. A. Auzana i S. N. Bobyleva. M.: PROON v RF, 2011. - S. 130 - 141. (In Russ.).



Il’in V. I. Glubinka kak sotsiologicheskaya kategoriya. [Backwoods as a sociological category]. J. Materialy IV Ocherednogo Vserossiiskogo sotsiologicheskogo kongressa «Sotsiologiya i obshchestvo: global’nye vyzovy i regional’noe razvitie». [Elektronnyi resurs]. Rossiiskoe obshchestvo sotsiologov URL: http://www.ssa-rss.ru/files/File/congress2012/part75. pdf (data obrashcheniya: 25. 07. 2012). (In Russ.).



Inglkhart R., Vel’tsel’ K. Modernizatsiya, kul’turnye izmeneniya i demokratiya. Posledovatel’nost’ chelovecheskogo razvitiya. [Modernization, Cultural Change and Democracy. Sequence of human development]. M.: Novoe izdatel’stvo, 2011. — 462 s. (Russ. ed).



Kastel’s M. Informatsionnaya epokha: ekonomika, obshchestvo, kul’tura. [The Information Age:Economy, Society, Culture]. M.: GU VShE, 2000. — 606 s. (Russ. ed.).



Mudrik A. V. Sotsial’naya pedagogika: Ucheb. dlya stud. ped. vuzov. [Social pedagogy]. Pod red. V. A. Slastenina. M.: Izdatel’skii tsentr «Akademiya», 2000. — 192 s. (In Russ.).



Mukhanova M. N., Zhvitiashvili A. Sh. i dr. Rossiiskoe selo: Sotsial’no-strukturnye protsessy ot proshlogo k nastoyashchemu. [Russian village: Socio-structural processes from past to present]. M.: Knizhnyi dom «LIBROKOM», 2014. — 304 s. (In Russ.).



Rossiya regionov: v kakom sotsial’nom prostranstve my zhivem? [Russian regions: the social space in which we live?]. J. Nezavisimyi institut sotsial’noi politiki. M.: Pomatur, 2005. — 277 s. (In Russ.).



Rossman V. V poiskakh Chetvertogo Rima: Rossiiskie debaty o perenose stolitsy. [In Search ofthe Fourth Rome: Russian debate on the transfer ofthe capital]. M.: Izd. dom NIU VShE, 2014. — 288 s. (In Russ.).



Ustoichivoe razvitie i sotsial’no-ekologicheskie parametry kachestva zhizni. [Sustainable development and social and environmental quality of life parameters]. Pod red. A. I. Zelenkova. Minsk: BGU, 2011. — 292 s. (In Russ.).



Yanitskii O. N. Sotsial’nye dvizheniya: teoriya, praktika, perspektiva. [Social movements: theory, practice, perspective]. M.: Novyi khronograf, 2013. — 360 s. (In Russ)



Changing Values and Beliefs in 85 Countries: Trends from the Values Surveys from 1981 to 2004. Leiden: Brill, 2008. — 274 p.



Giddens A. Central Problems in Social Theory. Action, Structure, and Contradiction in Social Analysis. London: MacMillan, 1979. — 294 p.



Feldman S. Values, Ideology, and Structure of Political Attitudes. J. Oxford Handbook of Political Psychology. 2003. — 480 p.



Rokeach M. Understanding Human Values: Individual and Societal. NY: The Free Press, 1979. — 230 p.
Citation Formats
Other cite formats:

Harvard
Trofimova, I. N. (2015) ’«Megalopolis» and «Remote Place» as Models of Value Orientations and Political Attitudes of Russians’, Sociologicheskaja nauka i social’naja praktika, (3), pp. 60-78. Available at: https://www.socnp.ru/index.php/snsp/article/view/3078 (Accessed: 18May2024).